On November 7, 2025, the Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice James Omotosho, held proceedings in the ongoing terrorism trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Kanu, who is representing himself, again refused to open his defense, reiterating his long-standing position that the seven-count charge against him is invalid because it relies on repealed laws (specifically, the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act of 2013, which was superseded by the 2022 version, and references to non-existent or outdated sections of the Criminal Code). He argued that the Federal Government has failed to amend the charges as directed by the Supreme Court in a prior ruling, rendering the trial a nullity and denying him a fair hearing.
Kanu filed and adopted a motion challenging the court’s jurisdiction and demanding clarification on the applicable law. When pressed by the judge to read the charges aloud, it highlighted the discrepancies (citations to repealed provisions under Sections 1-6 and a non-existent “Criminal Code Cap C45”). Kanu accused the court of “constructive denial of fair hearing” and persecution, emphasizing that no trial can proceed without a valid, extant law.
Lead counsel Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN) urged the court to close Kanu’s defense, noting that he had already used five of the six allotted days without presenting witnesses or evidence, effectively waiving his right.
Justice Omotosho, acknowledging Kanu’s non-lawyer status, had previously granted extensions but deemed this the “final opportunity.” After Kanu’s refusal, the judge ruled that his defense is now closed. The court also addressed complaints about access: It ordered the Department of State Services (DSS) to allow Kanu to consult his former lawyers (now acting as “consultants”) and submit necessary documents, following family allegations of obstruction by DSS operatives that could have prevented his appearance.
The court fixed November 20, 2025, for delivery of judgment on the terrorism charges, which include allegations of inciting violence and killings in Nigeria’s South-East. Kanu maintains he is exercising his right to self-determination and has denied all wrongdoing.
This hearing follows a series of adjournments (e.g., October 27 to November 4, then to November 5, and now to November 7), The trial stems from Kanu’s 2021 extraordinary rendition from Kenya which attracted global condemnation. Supporters view the proceedings as politically motivated.
The judgment on November 20 could lead to conviction (potentially life imprisonment under terrorism laws), acquittal if the court upholds Kanu’s jurisdictional challenge, or further appeals. Kanu’s family and IPOB allies have called for his immediate release, citing violations of Section 36(12) of the Nigerian Constitution (no one can be convicted under a repealed law).
Family Writers Press International.
